Tags:
Permalink Reply by Saira Mansoor on January 30, 2011 at 1:24pm
Permalink Reply by khalid ali nawaz on April 8, 2012 at 5:15pm
Permalink Reply by Tyson on April 14, 2012 at 10:44am I think you would have to have both, but if I had to choose one, I would say it would be vision. Vision will allow you to move a project forward and see many possibilities. Innovation is also important, but is not always persuasive.
i think if you have vision... it is followed by innovative mind....
Permalink Reply by Octavian Ungureanu on May 11, 2012 at 10:38am I would say more a larger understanding. So it will be the vision. The innovative approach is more a part of the profession: we always provide new solutions for our clients needs. The design itself is a problem solving challenge and continuing to find solutions for needs expressed always in new ways is making the architect to be innovative. I am not talking about new forms, new aesthetics, but the novelty of each project demanding new answers.
Permalink Reply by Sam Leach on August 14, 2012 at 8:16am I think that vision and innovation go hand in hand. Architects are considered generalists who know something about everything rather than everything about something. The more adept we are at being a generalist, the better we are at assessing multiple factors (be they social, political, environmental, technological...) and creating a vision of a viable design concept. If you have confidence in your ideas you will find a way to make them work.
© 2013 Created by ArchitectureLinked.